|
The Brookings Institute has called our region’s transportation governance ‘sclerotic’ (meaning ‘hardened’). In a Seattle Times column, link below, Bruce Katz said, “[t]he region has simply grown too much to have mobility run by a farrago of agencies… [T]he days of multiple competing systems and their redundancies, wasting infrastructure dollars (read taxes), need to end. A coordinated regional transportation strategy is necessary.” |
|
In short, while we sit in traffic, the people we hire to fix transportation are sitting in meetings. We get more studies, longer delays, lots of process and moderate incremental gains with this highly fragmented system.
But that delay and indecision burns through money, as inflation and external pressures drive up costs of projects. And to make it worse, one of the unfortunate effects of putting major public transportation packages to a public vote is that it takes much longer and thus ends up costing us more in the long run!
The re-design of the SR 520 bridge has been in the works for over ten years. Even with recent design approval by affected jurisdictions, there are many approving steps left and construction won’t begin for another couple of years. That’s a strong indication that something’s not working. (There are, of course, many more, but I need to be brief.)
Eastside legislators must work to ensure that the SR 520 corridor and I-405 are priorities for the state and the region. But because we don’t travel only within the 48th District, we need to ensure that the entire system works for us, too.
Here’s what we need to do:
|
Governments with Regional Transportation Responsibilities
| |||||
|
|
No of Board Members |
Executive Decision |
Area |
How Selected |
FUNCTIONS |
|
WashDOT |
7 |
Yes |
State |
Appointed |
Roads, ferries |
|
Puget Sound Regional Council |
30 |
No |
4 Counties |
Appointed |
Planning |
|
Regional Transportation Investment District |
25 |
Yes |
3 Counties |
Elected |
Roads |
|
Sound Transit |
18 |
No |
<3 Counties |
Appointed |
Bus, commuter and light rail |
|
King Co METRO |
13 |
Yes |
1 county, 39 cities |
Elected |
Bus |
|
Pierce Transit |
7 |
No |
1 county, multiple cities |
Appointed |
Bus |
|
Community Transit |
11 |
No |
County |
Appointed |
Bus |
|
Everett Transit |
7 |
Yes |
City |
Elected |
Bus |
|
King County |
13 |
Yes |
County |
Elected |
Roads and Streets |
|
Pierce County |
7 |
Yes |
County |
Elected |
Roads and Streets |
|
Snohomish County |
5 |
Yes |
County |
Elected |
Roads and Streets |
|
Cities (80+) |
400+ |
Some |
Multiple cities |
Elected |
Roads and Streets |
This chart does not include the Transportation Improvement Board, Transportation Commission, the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board, County Road Administration Board, LIDs/RIDs, Transportation Benefit Districts, State Legislature, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, Port of Everett.
For more information on transportation plans and data, check these websites:
Puget Sound Regional Council - www.psrc.org
Washington State Department of Transportation - www.wsdot.gov
Quote above can be found in The Great City, Bruce Katz, Director, Metropolitan Policy Program, appearing in The Seattle Times, January 30, 2005; http://www.brookings.edu/views/op-ed/katz/20050130.htm
If you have questions or comments about these issues or others, please don’t hesitate to contact me via email at deb@debeddy.net or phone 425.827.9105.
Newsletters
Subscribe
|